[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230330092316.52bb7d6b@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 09:23:16 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: jbrouer@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, simon.horman@...igine.com,
sinquersw@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 2/2] net: introduce budget_squeeze to help
us tune rx behavior
On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 17:59:46 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> I'm wondering for now if I can update and resend this patch to have a
> better monitor (actually we do need one) on this part since we have
> touched the net_rx_action() in the rps optimization patch series?
> Also, just like Jesper mentioned before, it can be considered as one
> 'fix' to a old problem but targetting to net-next is just fine. What
> do you think about it ?
Sorry, I don't understand what you're trying to say :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists