[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1680156071.4256074-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:01:11 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] virtio_net: introduce virtnet_get_netdev()
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 21:22:03 -0700, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 17:28:43 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > +const struct net_device_ops *virtnet_get_netdev(void)
> > +{
> > + return &virtnet_netdev;
> > +}
>
> Why not just make the virtnet_netdev symbol visible?
> Many drivers do that.
>
> If you prefer the function maybe virtnet_get_ndos() would be a better
> name for example? The current name sounds like it will get a... well..
> a netdev. And it gets ops.
Will fix.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists