netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] virtio_net: introduce receive_small

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 Mar 2023 15:20:35 +0800
From:   Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 8/8] virtio_net: introduce receive_small_xdp()

On Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:48:22 +0200, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-03-28 at 20:04 +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > @@ -949,15 +1042,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev,
> >  {
> >  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> >  	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> > -	unsigned int xdp_headroom = (unsigned long)ctx;
> > -	unsigned int header_offset = VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;
> > +	unsigned int header_offset = VIRTNET_RX_PAD;
> >  	unsigned int headroom = vi->hdr_len + header_offset;
>
> This changes (reduces) the headroom for non-xpd-pass skbs.
>
> [...]
> > +	buf += header_offset;
> > +	memcpy(skb_vnet_hdr(skb), buf, vi->hdr_len);
>
> AFAICS, that also means that receive_small(), for such packets, will
> look for the virtio header in a different location. Is that expected?


That is a mistake.

Will fix.

Thanks.

>
> Thanks.
>
> Paolo
>