[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230403141918.3257a195@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 14:19:18 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: Maxim Georgiev <glipus@...il.com>, kory.maincent@...tlin.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v2] Add NDOs for hardware timestamp get/set
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 15:26:22 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > @@ -7365,6 +7364,8 @@ static const struct net_device_ops e1000e_netdev_ops = {
> > .ndo_set_features = e1000_set_features,
> > .ndo_fix_features = e1000_fix_features,
> > .ndo_features_check = passthru_features_check,
> > + .ndo_hwtstamp_get = e1000e_hwtstamp_get,
> > + .ndo_hwtstamp_set = e1000e_hwtstamp_set,
> > };
>
> The conversion per se looks almost in line with what I was expecting to
> see, except for the comments. I guess you can convert a single driver
> first (e1000 seems fine), to get the API merged, then more people could
> work in parallel?
>
> Or do you want netdevsim to cover hardware timestamping from the
> beginning too, Jakub?
I'd vote to split netdevsim out, and it needs a selftest which
exercises it under tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/netdevsim/
to get merged...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists