lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230403171154.1b2d5416@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 17:11:54 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>, Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>, Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>, Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>, Ferenc Fejes <ferenc.fejes@...csson.com>, Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Pranavi Somisetty <pranavi.somisetty@....com>, Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Michael Sit Wei Hong <michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>, Mohammad Athari Bin Ismail <mohammad.athari.ismail@...el.com>, Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/9] Add tc-mqprio and tc-taprio support for preemptible traffic classes On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 02:43:39 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > I revived the series. I'm a bit weary about asking Konstantin to make > > the pw-bot compare tree tags because people change trees all the time > > (especially no tree -> net-next / net) and he would have to filter out > > the version.. It's gonna get wobbly. Let's see if the problem gets more > > common. > > Thanks. Was it supposed to change state? Because it's still "superseded". Argh, the bot keeps rescanning and re-marking it as Superseded :( We have a backup patch tracking method of ... what's unread in my inbox. So we should be able to rely on that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists