lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <50f7d60a35b71048552e01612bfa3c5d36961d28.camel@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:40:06 +0200 From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: net: rps_default_mask.sh: delete veth link specifically On Tue, 2023-04-04 at 15:24 +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > When deleting the netns and recreating a new one while re-adding the > veth interface, there is a small window of time during which the old > veth interface has not yet been removed. This can cause the new addition > to fail. To resolve this issue, we can either wait for a short while to > ensure that the old veth interface is deleted, or we can specifically > remove the veth interface. > > Before this patch: > # ./rps_default_mask.sh > empty rps_default_mask [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask dont affect existing devices [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask dont affect existing netns [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask affect newly created devices [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask don't affect newly child netns[II][ ok ] > rps_default_mask is 0 by default in child netns [ ok ] > RTNETLINK answers: File exists > changing rps_default_mask in child ns don't affect the main one[ ok ] > cat: /sys/class/net/vethC11an1/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus: No such file or directory > changing rps_default_mask in child ns affects new childns devices./rps_default_mask.sh: line 36: [: -eq: unary operator expected > [fail] expected 1 found > changing rps_default_mask in child ns don't affect existing devices[ ok ] > > After this patch: > # ./rps_default_mask.sh > empty rps_default_mask [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask dont affect existing devices [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask dont affect existing netns [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask affect newly created devices [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask don't affect newly child netns[II][ ok ] > rps_default_mask is 0 by default in child netns [ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask in child ns don't affect the main one[ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask in child ns affects new childns devices[ ok ] > changing rps_default_mask in child ns don't affect existing devices[ ok ] > > Fixes: 3a7d84eae03b ("self-tests: more rps self tests") > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/net/rps_default_mask.sh | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rps_default_mask.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rps_default_mask.sh > index 0fd0d2db3abc..a26c5624429f 100755 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/rps_default_mask.sh > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/rps_default_mask.sh > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ ip link set dev $VETH up > ip -n $NETNS link set dev $VETH up > chk_rps "changing rps_default_mask affect newly created devices" "" $VETH 3 > chk_rps "changing rps_default_mask don't affect newly child netns[II]" $NETNS $VETH 0 > +ip link del dev $VETH > ip netns del $NETNS > > setup LGTM, thanks! Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists