[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b945cf5b-4085-551f-7bb8-9bc4e38d0397@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 19:18:22 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>,
<ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, <hawk@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] skbuff: Fix a race between coalescing and releasing SKBs
On 2023/4/4 15:47, Liang Chen wrote:
> Commit 1effe8ca4e34 allowed coalescing to proceed with non page pool page
> and page pool page when @from is cloned, i.e.
>
> to->pp_recycle --> false
> from->pp_recycle --> true
> skb_cloned(from) --> true
>
> However, it actually requires skb_cloned(@from) to hold true until
> coalescing finishes in this situation. If the other cloned SKB is
> released while the merging is in process, from_shinfo->nr_frags will be
> set to 0 toward the end of the function, causing the increment of frag
> page _refcount to be unexpectedly skipped resulting in inconsistent
> reference counts. Later when SKB(@to) is released, it frees the page
> directly even though the page pool page is still in use, leading to
> use-after-free or double-free errors. So it should be prohibitted.
Nice catch.
>
> The double-free error message below prompted us to investigate:
> BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/1 pfn:0e0d1
> page:00000000c6548b28 refcount:-1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000
> index:0x2 pfn:0xe0d1
> flags: 0xfffffc0000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
> raw: 000fffffc0000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000101 0000000000000000
> raw: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000
> page dumped because: nonzero _refcount
>
> CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G E 6.2.0+
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50
> bad_page+0x69/0xf0
> free_pcp_prepare+0x260/0x2f0
> free_unref_page+0x20/0x1c0
> skb_release_data+0x10b/0x1a0
> napi_consume_skb+0x56/0x150
> net_rx_action+0xf0/0x350
> ? __napi_schedule+0x79/0x90
> __do_softirq+0xc8/0x2b1
> __irq_exit_rcu+0xb9/0xf0
> common_interrupt+0x82/0xa0
> </IRQ>
> <TASK>
> asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40
> RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x20
A Fixes tag is needed for the backport of the fix.
Fixes: 1effe8ca4e34 ("skbuff: fix coalescing for page_pool fragment recycling")
And target the net branch for bugfix:
[PATCH net] skbuff: Fix a race between coalescing and releasing SKBs
Otherwise, it looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 17 +++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 050a875d09c5..9be23ece5f03 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -5598,17 +5598,14 @@ bool skb_try_coalesce(struct sk_buff *to, struct sk_buff *from,
> return false;
>
> /* In general, avoid mixing slab allocated and page_pool allocated
> - * pages within the same SKB. However when @to is not pp_recycle and
> - * @from is cloned, we can transition frag pages from page_pool to
> - * reference counted.
> - *
> - * On the other hand, don't allow coalescing two pp_recycle SKBs if
> - * @from is cloned, in case the SKB is using page_pool fragment
> - * references (PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG). Since we only take full page
> - * references for cloned SKBs at the moment that would result in
> - * inconsistent reference counts.
> + * pages within the same SKB. However don't allow coalescing two
> + * pp_recycle SKBs if @from is cloned, in case the SKB is using
> + * page_pool fragment references (PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG). Since we only
> + * take full page references for cloned SKBs at the moment that would
> + * result in inconsistent reference counts.
> */
> - if (to->pp_recycle != (from->pp_recycle && !skb_cloned(from)))
> + if ((to->pp_recycle != from->pp_recycle)
> + || (from->pp_recycle && skb_cloned(from)))
> return false;
>
> if (len <= skb_tailroom(to)) {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists