lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZCwfGk2cv9d4biNR@vergenet.net> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 14:59:06 +0200 From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> Cc: Dario Binacchi <dario.binacchi@...rulasolutions.com>, Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: CAN_BXCAN should depend on ARCH_STM32 On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 01:59:00PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The STMicroelectronics STM32 basic extended CAN Controller (bxCAN) is > only present on STM32 SoCs. Hence drop the "|| OF" part from its > dependency rule, to prevent asking the user about this driver when > configuring a kernel without STM32 SoC support. > > Fixes: f00647d8127be4d3 ("can: bxcan: add support for ST bxCAN controller") > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists