lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZCuLTjZjg7pZqO0X@Laptop-X1> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 10:28:30 +0800 From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com> To: Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Liang Li <liali@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/3] selftests: bonding: re-format bond option tests On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:31:47AM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/bonding/bond_lib.sh > > > > I like this idea, we might want to separate network topology from library > > code however. That way a given test case can just include a predefined > > Would you like to help explain more clear? Separate network topology to where? Hi Jon, would you please help explain this part? Thanks Hangbin > > > topology. A quick review of the test cases show a 2 node setup is the most > > common across all test cases. > > Liang suggested that with 2 clients we can test xmit_hash_policy. In > client_create() I only create 1 client for current testing. We can add more > clients in future. > > Thanks > Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists