netdev - Re: [REGRESSION] v6.1+ bind() does not fail with EADDRINUSE if dual stack is bound

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <833120c6-8a96-4773-9205-6d3aadbba6b7@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 15:31:59 +0200
From:   "Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)" 
        <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Paul Holzinger <pholzing@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
        martin.lau@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] v6.1+ bind() does not fail with EADDRINUSE if dual
 stack is bound

[TLDR: This mail in primarily relevant for Linux kernel regression
tracking. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]

On 10.03.23 17:01, Paul Holzinger wrote:
> 
> there seems to be a regression which allows you to bind the same port
> twice when the first bind call bound to all ip addresses (i. e. dual
> stack).
> [...]
> Original report: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/17719
> 
> #regzbot introduced: 5456262d2baa

I had missed that a fix for this was applied, as it didn't contain a
link to the reports for this issue, hence I have to specify it manually
to resolve this:

#regzbot fix: d9ba9934285514f1f9
#regzbot ignore-activity

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.