netdev - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dsa: brcm,sf2: Drop unneeded "#address-cells/#size-cells"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230405175445.3e7639e1@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 5 Apr 2023 17:54:45 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dsa: brcm,sf2: Drop unneeded
 "#address-cells/#size-cells"

On Tue,  4 Apr 2023 15:41:52 -0500 Rob Herring wrote:
> There's no need for "#address-cells/#size-cells" in the brcm,sf2 node as
> no immediate child nodes have an address. What was probably intended was
> to put them in the 'ports' node, but that's not necessary as that is
> covered by ethernet-switch.yaml via dsa.yaml.

There was an application fuzz on this one, FWIW. 
Hope I'm not messing up...