lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230405175445.3e7639e1@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 17:54:45 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dsa: brcm,sf2: Drop unneeded "#address-cells/#size-cells" On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 15:41:52 -0500 Rob Herring wrote: > There's no need for "#address-cells/#size-cells" in the brcm,sf2 node as > no immediate child nodes have an address. What was probably intended was > to put them in the 'ports' node, but that's not necessary as that is > covered by ethernet-switch.yaml via dsa.yaml. There was an application fuzz on this one, FWIW. Hope I'm not messing up...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists