netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: provide macros for commonly copied lockless queue stop/wake code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 07:46:48 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: provide macros for commonly copied
 lockless queue stop/wake code

On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 07:17:09 -0700 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Mightn't preemption or interrupts cause further issues?  Or are preemption
> > > and/or interrupts disabled across the relevant sections of code?  
> > 
> > The code in question is supposed to run in softirq context.  So
> > both interrupts and preemption should be disabled.  
> 
> Agreed, preemption will be enabled in softirq, but interrupts can still
> happen, correct?

Starting the queue only happens from softirq (I hope) and stopping 
can happen from any context. So we're risking false-starts again.
I think this puts to bed any hope of making this code safe against
false-starts with just barriers :(