lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 20:39:11 +0200
From:   Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc:     Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        ath10k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: net: Convert ATH10K to YAML



On 6.04.2023 20:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/04/2023 20:26, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
>>>> +        interrupts:
>>>> +          items:
>>>> +            - description: CE0
>>>> +            - description: CE1
>>>> +            - description: CE2
>>>> +            - description: CE3
>>>> +            - description: CE4
>>>> +            - description: CE5
>>>> +            - description: CE6
>>>> +            - description: CE7
>>>> +            - description: CE8
>>>> +            - description: CE9
>>>> +            - description: CE10
>>>> +            - description: CE11
>>>
>>> What about interrupt-names here? If they are not expected, then just
>>> interrupt-names: false
>> They obviously wouldn't hurt, but they're unused on the driver side:
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < CE_COUNT; i++) {
>> 		ret = platform_get_irq(ar_snoc->dev, i);
>>
>> So I will forbid them.
> 
> Assuming DTS does not have them.
Tested locally, no warnings, so looks like nobody used them in dt.

Konrad
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ