lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230406120441.1276ef49@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Apr 2023 12:04:41 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@...gle.com>,
        Shailend Chand <shailend@...gle.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 10:49:27 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/net/ethernet/google/gve/gve.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   3ce934558097 ("gve: Secure enough bytes in the first TX desc for all TCP pkts")
> 
> from the net tree and commit:
> 
>   75eaae158b1b ("gve: Add XDP DROP and TX support for GQI-QPL format")
> 
> from the net-next tree.

I fixed the conflict in net-next but Praveen, Shailend - one of you
called the constant MIN and the other one MAX. So which one is it?
Please send a patch to net-next which removes one of them and uses
the other consistently, they seem to serve the same purpose.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ