[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230406185701.066c9243@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:57:01 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...a.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@...a.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] bpf: Follow up to RCU enforcement in the
verifier.
On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 18:32:33 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > Check if your git config is right:
> >
> > $ git config --get pw.server
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/api/1.1/
> >
> > that's where $srv comes from
>
> Ahh. All works now!
> I like the new output.
> I'll play with it more.
> Should -M be a default? Any downside?
There should be no difference, AFAICT. I'm happy with making it
the default.
There's a minor difference in the merge-message formatting between
-c and -s we could possibly remove if we make -M the default.
Daniel uses the subject of the series as a fake branch name on the
Merge branch '$branch_name'
line, while I convert the subject to a format which can be a real
branch name in git (no spaces, special chars etc) and put the subject
as the first line of the merge text.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists