netdev - Re: [net 03/10] net/mlx5e: XDP, Allow growing tail for XDP multi buffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZDFPCxBz0u6ClXnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 8 Apr 2023 14:24:59 +0300
From:   Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [net 03/10] net/mlx5e: XDP, Allow growing tail for XDP multi
 buffer

On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 10:07:44 -0800, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On 23 Feb 16:34, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:52:40 -0800 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@...il.com>
> > > 
> > > The cited commits missed passing frag_size to __xdp_rxq_info_reg, which
> > > is required by bpf_xdp_adjust_tail to support growing the tail pointer
> > > in fragmented packets. Pass the missing parameter when the current RQ
> > > mode allows XDP multi buffer.
> > 
> > Why is this a fix and not an (omitted) feature?
> 
> I am sure not intentional, but I agree not critical.

What's the destiny of my two patches (3 and 4)? I don't see them applied
to either net or net-next.