lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDVFHe9Hr1csMAgm@corigine.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 13:31:41 +0200
From:   Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     Denis Plotnikov <den-plotnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        anirban.chakraborty@...gic.com, sony.chacko@...gic.com,
        GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, helgaas@...nel.org,
        manishc@...vell.com, shshaikh@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] qlcnic: check pci_reset_function result

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 01:24:33PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-04-07 at 10:18 +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > Static code analyzer complains to unchecked return value.
> > The result of pci_reset_function() is unchecked.
> > Despite, the issue is on the FLR supported code path and in that
> > case reset can be done with pcie_flr(), the patch uses less invasive
> > approach by adding the result check of pci_reset_function().
> > 
> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> > 
> > Fixes: 7e2cf4feba05 ("qlcnic: change driver hardware interface mechanism")
> > Signed-off-by: Denis Plotnikov <den-plotnikov@...dex-team.ru>
> 
> Any special reason to target the net-next tree? This looks like a -net
> candidate to me?

FWIIW, net would be fine by me.
Sorry for not noticing this during earlier review.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ