netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/6] net: mvneta: reduce size of TSO header allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 19:07:02 +0200
From:   Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/6] net: mvneta: reduce size of TSO header
 allocation

On Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:50:47 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I think the Turris folk are waiting for me to get this into the kernel
> and backported to stable before they merge it into their tree and we
> therefore end up with it being tested.
> 
> We are now at -rc7, and this series is in danger of missing the
> upcoming merge window.
> 
> So, I think it's time that I posted a wake-up call here to say that no,
> that's not going to happen until such time that we know whether these
> patches solve the problem that they identified. I'm not bunging patches
> into the kernel for problems people have without those people testing
> the proposed changes.
> 
> I think if the Turris folk want to engage with mainline for assistance
> in resolving issues, they need to do their part and find a way to
> provide kernels to test out proposed fixes for their problems.

Hello Russell,

sorry about this, our kernel team was halved a few months ago and things
are a little hectic here. Tomorrow I will try to apply these patches
and build a testing release of TurrisOS for users who have this issue.
Hopefully they will report positively to it.

Marek


> On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 07:29:59PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > With reference to
> > https://forum.turris.cz/t/random-kernel-exceptions-on-hbl-tos-7-0/18865/
> > 
> > It appears that mvneta attempts an order-6 allocation for the TSO
> > header memory. While this succeeds early on in the system's life time,
> > trying order-6 allocations later can result in failure due to memory
> > fragmentation.
> > 
> > Firstly, the reason it's so large is that we take the number of
> > transmit descriptors, and allocate a TSO header buffer for each, and
> > each TSO header is 256 bytes. The driver uses a simple mechanism to
> > determine the address - it uses the transmit descriptor index as an
> > index into the TSO header memory.
> > 
> > 	(The first obvious question is: do there need to be this
> > 	many? Won't each TSO header always have at least one bit
> > 	of data to go with it? In other words, wouldn't the maximum
> > 	number of TSO headers that a ring could accept be the number
> > 	of ring entries divided by 2?)
> > 
> > There is no real need for this memory to be an order-6 allocation,
> > since nothing in hardware requires this buffer to be contiguous.
> > 
> > Therefore, this series splits this order-6 allocation up into 32
> > order-1 allocations (8k pages on 4k page platforms), each giving
> > 32 TSO headers per page.
> > 
> > In order to do this, these patches:
> > 
> > 1) fix a horrible transmit path error-cleanup bug - the existing
> >    code unmaps from the first descriptor that was allocated at
> >    interface bringup, not the first descriptor that the packet
> >    is using, resulting in the wrong descriptors being unmapped.
> > 
> > 2) since xdp support was added, we now have buf->type which indicates
> >    what this transmit buffer contains. Use this to mark TSO header
> >    buffers.
> > 
> > 3) get rid of IS_TSO_HEADER(), instead using buf->type to determine
> >    whether this transmit buffer needs to be DMA-unmapped.
> > 
> > 4) move tso_build_hdr() into mvneta_tso_put_hdr() to keep all the
> >    TSO header building code together.
> > 
> > 5) split the TSO header allocation into chunks of order-1 pages.
> > 
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 166 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> > FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
> >   
>