netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] net: ethtool: add a mutex protecting RSS contexts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ea711ae7-c730-4347-a148-0602c69c9828@lunn.ch>
Date:   Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:40:19 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     edward.cree@....com
Cc:     linux-net-drivers@....com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        habetsm.xilinx@...il.com, sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 6/7] net: ethtool: add a mutex protecting
 RSS contexts

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 07:26:14PM +0100, edward.cree@....com wrote:
> From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
> 
> While this is not needed to serialise the ethtool entry points (which
>  are all under RTNL), drivers may have cause to asynchronously access
>  dev->ethtool->rss_ctx; taking dev->ethtool->rss_lock allows them to
>  do this safely without needing to take the RTNL.

What is actually wrong with taking RTNL? KISS is often best,
especially for locks.

     Andrew