[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZDavJCLutKC/+oHZ@Laptop-X1>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 21:16:20 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rtnetlink: Restore RTM_NEW/DELLINK notification
behavior
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:21:33AM +0200, Martin Willi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Fixes: f3a63cce1b4f ("rtnetlink: Honour NLM_F_ECHO flag in rtnl_delete_link")
> > > Fixes: d88e136cab37 ("rtnetlink: Honour NLM_F_ECHO flag in rtnl_newlink_create")
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Willi <martin@...ongswan.org>
> >
> > Not sure if the Fixes tag should be
> > 1d997f101307 ("rtnetlink: pass netlink message header and portid to rtnl_configure_link()")
>
> While this one adds the infrastructure, the discussed issue manifests
Yes
> only with the two commits above. Anyway, I'm fine with either, let me
> know if I shall change it.
In my understanding the above 2 commits only pass netlink header to
rtnl_configure_link. The question code in 1d997f101307 didn't check if
NLM_F_ECHO is honoured, as your commit pointed.
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists