lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230412071816.0c0898ee@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:18:16 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH net,v2] uapi: linux: restore IPPROTO_MAX to 256 and add IPPROTO_UAPI_MAX On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:25:58 +0200 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > IPPROTO_RAW = 255, /* Raw IP packets */ > + IPPROTO_MAX, > #define IPPROTO_RAW nit: any reason the IPPROTO_MAX is in between the enum entry and its associated define?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists