[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230412071816.0c0898ee@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 07:18:16 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com, matthieu.baerts@...sares.net,
mptcp@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net,v2] uapi: linux: restore IPPROTO_MAX to 256 and add
IPPROTO_UAPI_MAX
On Thu, 6 Apr 2023 11:25:58 +0200 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> IPPROTO_RAW = 255, /* Raw IP packets */
> + IPPROTO_MAX,
> #define IPPROTO_RAW
nit: any reason the IPPROTO_MAX is in between the enum entry
and its associated define?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists