lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230412142733.6jhxt7kjf3nwqzsy@skbuf> Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 17:27:33 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Hans J. Schultz" <netdev@...io-technology.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Arkadi Sharshevsky <arkadis@...lanox.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: switchdev: don't notify FDB entries with "master dynamic" On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 05:15:03PM +0300, Ido Schimmel wrote: > > Looking at tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/, there is no valid > > use of the "bridge fdb add ... master dynamic" command there, so I am > > fairly confident that no one used to rely on this behavior. > > Yes, but there are tests that use "extern_learn". If you post a v2 that > takes "BR_FDB_ADDED_BY_EXT_LEARN" into account, then I can ask Petr to > run it through our regression and report back (not sure we will make it > to this week's PR though). > > Thanks How are extern_learn FDB entries processed by spectrum's SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE handler?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists