[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALDO+Sac1_QnZgBo6SoyCrEY5-VG-rGXuutVY5GJrgxXRSsHkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 16:29:32 -0700
From: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jsankararama@...are.com, gyang@...are.com,
doshir@...are.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
alexandr.lobakin@...el.com, bang@...are.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, witu@...dia.com,
horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, error27@...il.com,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v19] vmxnet3: Add XDP support.
Hi Alexander,
Sorry for my late reply and thanks for taking another round of review!
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 8:43 AM Alexander Lobakin
<aleksander.lobakin@...el.com> wrote:
>
> From: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
> Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 10:28:28 -0700
>
> Sorry for the late reply, I've been busy :s
>
> > From: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
> >
> > The patch adds native-mode XDP support: XDP DROP, PASS, TX, and REDIRECT.
> >
> > Background:
>
> [...]
>
> > +static int
> > +vmxnet3_run_xdp(struct vmxnet3_rx_queue *rq, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> > + struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > +{
> > + struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> > + struct page *page;
> > + int err;
> > + u32 act;
> > +
> > + act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, xdp);
> > + rq->stats.xdp_packets++;
>
> I think you can increment it *before* running the program, so that
> there'll be as tiny time gap as possible.
Good idea, will do it.
>
> > + page = virt_to_page(xdp->data_hard_start);
>
> You don't need it for PASS and REDIRECT.
>
> > +
> > + switch (act) {
> > + case XDP_PASS:
> > + return act;
> > + case XDP_REDIRECT:
> > + err = xdp_do_redirect(rq->adapter->netdev, xdp, prog);
> > + if (!err)
> > + rq->stats.xdp_redirects++;
> > + else
> > + rq->stats.xdp_drops++;
>
> BTW, if you get @err here, shouldn't you recycle the page, just like in
> TX case?
Yes, will fix it.
>
> > + return act;
> > + case XDP_TX:
> > + xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp);
> > + if (unlikely(!xdpf ||
> > + vmxnet3_xdp_xmit_back(rq->adapter, xdpf))) {
> > + rq->stats.xdp_drops++;
> > + page_pool_recycle_direct(rq->page_pool, page);
> > + } else {
> > + rq->stats.xdp_tx++;
> > + }
> > + return act;
> > + default:
> > + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(rq->adapter->netdev, prog, act);
> > + fallthrough;
> > + case XDP_ABORTED:
> > + trace_xdp_exception(rq->adapter->netdev, prog, act);
> > + rq->stats.xdp_aborted++;
> > + break;
> > + case XDP_DROP:
> > + rq->stats.xdp_drops++;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + page_pool_recycle_direct(rq->page_pool, page);
> > +
> > + return act;
> > +}
>
> [...]
>
> > + xdp_init_buff(&xdp, PAGE_SIZE, &rq->xdp_rxq);
> > + xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, page_address(page), rq->page_pool->p.offset,
> > + len, false);
> > + xdp_buff_clear_frags_flag(&xdp);
> > +
> > + /* Must copy the data because it's at dataring. */
> > + memcpy(xdp.data, data, len);
> > +
> > + rcu_read_lock();
>
> Where's the corresponding unlock?
I should remove this rcu_read_lock. A mistake in v16
- remove using rcu_read_lock,unlock around XDP invocation
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210624160609.292325-1-toke@redhat.com/
>
> > + xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(rq->adapter->xdp_bpf_prog);
> > + if (!xdp_prog) {
> > + act = XDP_PASS;
> > + goto out_skb;
> > + }
> > + act = vmxnet3_run_xdp(rq, &xdp, xdp_prog);
> > +
> > + if (act == XDP_PASS) {
> > +out_skb:
> > + *skb_xdp_pass = vmxnet3_build_skb(rq, page, &xdp);
> > + if (!*skb_xdp_pass)
> > + return XDP_DROP;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* No need to refill. */
> > + return act;
>
> Maybe
>
> act = vmxnet3_run_xdp(rq, &xdp, xdp_prog);
> if (act != XDP_PASS)
> return act;
>
> out_skb:
> *skb_xdp_pass = vmxnet3_build_skb(rq, page, &xdp);
>
> return likely(*skb_xdp_pass) ? act : XDP_DROP;
it does look simpler, will use this.
thanks
William
Powered by blists - more mailing lists