[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1147766.1681418362@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 21:39:22 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 01/18] net: Declare MSG_SPLICE_PAGES internal sendmsg() flag
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Note that io_sendmsg_prep() handles both IORING_OP_SENDMSG and IORING_OP_SEND,
> so this pair of functions can hit the same request. And sqe->msg_flags is
> not sanitized at all - it comes straight from user buffer.
Assuming ____sys_sendmsg() is fixed, I think it should be sufficient to make
io_send() and io_send_zc(). io_sendmsg() and io_sendmsg_zc() will go through
____sys_sendmsg().
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists