netdev - RE: 答复: [PATCH net] net: Add check for csum_start in skb_partial_csum

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64398b4c4585f_17abe429442@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 13:20:12 -0400
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        "luwei (O)" <luwei32@...wei.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "asml.silence@...il.com" <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        "imagedong@...cent.com" <imagedong@...cent.com>,
        "brouer@...hat.com" <brouer@...hat.com>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "jbenc@...hat.com" <jbenc@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 答复: [PATCH net] net: Add check for csum_start in skb_partial_csum_set()

Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> luwei (O) wrote:
> > yes, here is the vnet_hdr:
> > 
> >     flags: 3
> >     gso_type: 3
> >     hdr_len: 23
> >     gso_size: 58452
> >     csum_start: 5
> >     csum_offset: 16
> > 
> > and the packet:
> > 
> > | vnet_hdr | mac header | network header | data ... |
> > 
> >   memcpy((void*)0x20000200,
> >          "\x03\x03\x02\x00\x54\xe4\x05\x00\x10\x00\x80\x00\x00\x53\xcc\x9c\x2b"
> >          "\x19\x3b\x00\x00\x00\x89\x4f\x08\x03\x83\x81\x04",
> >          29);
> >   *(uint16_t*)0x200000c0 = 0x11;
> >   *(uint16_t*)0x200000c2 = htobe16(0);
> >   *(uint32_t*)0x200000c4 = r[3];
> >   *(uint16_t*)0x200000c8 = 1;
> >   *(uint8_t*)0x200000ca = 0;
> >   *(uint8_t*)0x200000cb = 6;
> >   memset((void*)0x200000cc, 170, 5);
> >   *(uint8_t*)0x200000d1 = 0;
> >   memset((void*)0x200000d2, 0, 2);
> >   syscall(__NR_sendto, r[1], 0x20000200ul, 0xe45ful, 0ul, 0x200000c0ul, 0x14ul);
> 
> Thanks. So this can happen whenever a packet is injected into the tx
> path with a virtio_net_hdr.
> 
> Even if we add bounds checking for the link layer header in pf_packet,
> it can still point to the network header.
> 
> If packets are looped to the tx path, skb_pull is common if a packet
> traverses tunnel devices. But csum_start does not directly matter in
> the rx path (CHECKSUM_PARTIAL is just seen as CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY).
> Until it is forwarded again to the tx path.
> 
> So the question is which code calls skb_checksum_start_offset on the
> tx path. Clearly, skb_checksum_help. Also a lot of drivers. Which
> may cast the signed int return value to an unsigned. Even an u8 in 
> the first driver I spotted (alx).
> 
> skb_postpull_rcsum anticipates a negative return value, as do other
> core functions. So it clearly allowed in certain cases. We cannot
> just bound it.
> 
> Summary after a long story: an initial investigation, but I don't have
> a good solution so far. Maybe others have a good suggestiong based on
> this added context.

Specific to skb_checksum_help, it appears that skb_checksum will
work with negative offset just fine.

Perhaps the only issue is that the WARN_ON_ONCE compares signed to
unsigned, and thus incorrectly interprets a negative offset as
 >= skb_headlen(skb)