[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <741012bd-70f7-63df-8d2a-37f713a587d1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 10:50:09 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
pablo@...filter.org, fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: skbuff: hide nf_trace and ipvs_property
On 4/14/23 09:01, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Accesses to nf_trace and ipvs_property are already wrapped
> by ifdefs where necessary. Don't allocate the bits for those
> fields at all if possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> CC: pablo@...filter.org
> CC: fw@...len.de
> ---
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index 543f7ae9f09f..7b43d5a03613 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -966,8 +966,12 @@ struct sk_buff {
> __u8 ndisc_nodetype:2;
> #endif
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IP_VS)
> __u8 ipvs_property:1;
> +#endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_NF_TABLES)
Should that be IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NT_TABLES) given it can be tristate?
> __u8 nf_trace:1;
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV
> __u8 offload_fwd_mark:1;
> __u8 offload_l3_fwd_mark:1;
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists