[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <f239d43df64292469fbe5dcc398fca545b8bacb4.1681507192.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:21:15 -0400
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/2] sctp: delete the obsolete code for the host name address param
In the latest RFC9260, the Host Name Address param has been deprecated.
For INIT chunk:
Note 3: An INIT chunk MUST NOT contain the Host Name Address
parameter. The receiver of an INIT chunk containing a Host Name
Address parameter MUST send an ABORT chunk and MAY include an
"Unresolvable Address" error cause.
For Supported Address Types:
The value indicating the Host Name Address parameter MUST NOT be
used when sending this parameter and MUST be ignored when receiving
this parameter.
Currently Linux SCTP doesn't really support Host Name Address param,
but only saves some flag and print debug info, which actually won't
even be triggered due to the verification in sctp_verify_param().
This patch is to delete those dead code.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
include/net/sctp/structs.h | 1 -
net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c | 10 +---------
net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
index a0933efd93c3..070c9458fff4 100644
--- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
+++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
@@ -1711,7 +1711,6 @@ struct sctp_association {
__u16 ecn_capable:1, /* Can peer do ECN? */
ipv4_address:1, /* Peer understands IPv4 addresses? */
ipv6_address:1, /* Peer understands IPv6 addresses? */
- hostname_address:1, /* Peer understands DNS addresses? */
asconf_capable:1, /* Does peer support ADDIP? */
prsctp_capable:1, /* Can peer do PR-SCTP? */
reconf_capable:1, /* Can peer do RE-CONFIG? */
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
index c7503fd64915..c8f4ec5d5f98 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c
@@ -2207,7 +2207,7 @@ static enum sctp_ierror sctp_verify_param(struct net *net,
break;
case SCTP_PARAM_HOST_NAME_ADDRESS:
- /* Tell the peer, we won't support this param. */
+ /* This param has been Deprecated, send ABORT. */
sctp_process_hn_param(asoc, param, chunk, err_chunk);
retval = SCTP_IERROR_ABORT;
break;
@@ -2589,10 +2589,6 @@ static int sctp_process_param(struct sctp_association *asoc,
asoc->cookie_life = ktime_add_ms(asoc->cookie_life, stale);
break;
- case SCTP_PARAM_HOST_NAME_ADDRESS:
- pr_debug("%s: unimplemented SCTP_HOST_NAME_ADDRESS\n", __func__);
- break;
-
case SCTP_PARAM_SUPPORTED_ADDRESS_TYPES:
/* Turn off the default values first so we'll know which
* ones are really set by the peer.
@@ -2624,10 +2620,6 @@ static int sctp_process_param(struct sctp_association *asoc,
asoc->peer.ipv6_address = 1;
break;
- case SCTP_PARAM_HOST_NAME_ADDRESS:
- asoc->peer.hostname_address = 1;
- break;
-
default: /* Just ignore anything else. */
break;
}
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 218e0982c370..079e726909b4 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -5195,7 +5195,7 @@ int sctp_get_sctp_info(struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc,
mask = asoc->peer.ecn_capable << 1;
mask = (mask | asoc->peer.ipv4_address) << 1;
mask = (mask | asoc->peer.ipv6_address) << 1;
- mask = (mask | asoc->peer.hostname_address) << 1;
+ mask = mask << 1;
mask = (mask | asoc->peer.asconf_capable) << 1;
mask = (mask | asoc->peer.prsctp_capable) << 1;
mask = (mask | asoc->peer.auth_capable);
--
2.39.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists