[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230414180205.1220135d@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 18:02:05 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Liang Li <liali@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 net-next] bonding: add software tx timestamping
support
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:35:26 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> v4: add ASSERT_RTNL to make sure bond_ethtool_get_ts_info() called via
> RTNL. Only check _TX_SOFTWARE for the slaves.
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> real_dev = bond_option_active_slave_get_rcu(bond);
> dev_hold(real_dev);
> @@ -5707,10 +5713,36 @@ static int bond_ethtool_get_ts_info(struct net_device *bond_dev,
> ret = ops->get_ts_info(real_dev, info);
> goto out;
> }
> + } else {
> + /* Check if all slaves support software tx timestamping */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
> + ret = -1;
> + ops = slave->dev->ethtool_ops;
> + phydev = slave->dev->phydev;
> +
> + if (phy_has_tsinfo(phydev))
> + ret = phy_ts_info(phydev, &ts_info);
> + else if (ops->get_ts_info)
> + ret = ops->get_ts_info(slave->dev, &ts_info);
My comment about this path being under rtnl was to point out that we
don't need the RCU protection to iterate over the slaves. This is
a bit of a guess, I don't know bonding, but can we not use
bond_for_each_slave() ?
As a general rule we should let all driver callbacks sleep. Drivers
may need to consult the FW or read something over a slow asynchronous
bus which requires process / non-atomic context. RCU lock puts us in
an atomic context. And ->get_ts_info() is a driver callback.
It's not a deal breaker if we can't avoid RCU, but if we can - we should
let the drivers sleep. Sorry if I wasn't very clear previously.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists