netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: skbuff: hide nf_trace and ipvs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Apr 2023 17:44:26 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        pablo@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: skbuff: hide nf_trace and
 ipvs_property

On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 01:11:39 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > I copied it from:
> > 
> > static inline void nf_reset_trace(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TRACE) || defined(CONFIG_NF_TABLES)
> > 	skb->nf_trace = 0;
> > #endif
> > }
> >
> > I can't quite figure out why this would be intentional.
> > Do the existing conditions need to be fixed?  
> 
> Yes, this is not correct; needs to be "|| IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_TABLES)".
> 
> Fixes: 478b360a47b7 ("netfilter: nf_tables: fix nf_trace always-on with XT_TRACE=n")
> 
> Let me know if you'd like to add the fix to v2 of your patchset
> yourself, otherwise I'll send a fixup patch to netfilter-devel@ on
> monday.

You can take the fix thru netfilter, I reckon. The new condition 
is wider so I should be able to proceed with v2 without waiting.