lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230417152805.331865-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:28:05 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        michael.chan@...adcom.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        hawk@...nel.org, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next] page_pool: add DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING on all mappings

Commit c519fe9a4f0d ("bnxt: add dma mapping attributes") added
DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING to DMA attrs on bnxt. It has since spread
to a few more drivers (possibly as a copy'n'paste).

DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING only seems to matter on Sparc and PowerPC/cell,
the rarity of these platforms is likely why we never bothered adding
the attribute in the page pool, even though it should be safe to add.

To make the page pool migration in drivers which set this flag less
of a risk (of regressing the precious sparc database workloads or
whatever needed this) let's add DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING on all
page pool DMA mappings.

We could make this a driver opt-in but frankly I don't think it's
worth complicating the API. I can't think of a reason why device
accesses to packet memory would have to be ordered.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
CC: hawk@...nel.org
CC: ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org
---
 net/core/page_pool.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/page_pool.c b/net/core/page_pool.c
index 2f6bf422ed30..97f20f7ff4fc 100644
--- a/net/core/page_pool.c
+++ b/net/core/page_pool.c
@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ static bool page_pool_dma_map(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
 	 */
 	dma = dma_map_page_attrs(pool->p.dev, page, 0,
 				 (PAGE_SIZE << pool->p.order),
-				 pool->p.dma_dir, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
+				 pool->p.dma_dir, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC |
+						  DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING);
 	if (dma_mapping_error(pool->p.dev, dma))
 		return false;
 
@@ -484,7 +485,7 @@ void page_pool_release_page(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
 	/* When page is unmapped, it cannot be returned to our pool */
 	dma_unmap_page_attrs(pool->p.dev, dma,
 			     PAGE_SIZE << pool->p.order, pool->p.dma_dir,
-			     DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
+			     DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC | DMA_ATTR_WEAK_ORDERING);
 	page_pool_set_dma_addr(page, 0);
 skip_dma_unmap:
 	page_pool_clear_pp_info(page);
-- 
2.39.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ