[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1681711081.378984-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:58:01 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xsk: introduce xsk_dma_ops
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 21:24:32 -0700, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 11:27:50AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > The purpose of this patch is to allow driver pass the own dma_ops to
> > xsk.
>
> Drivers have no business passing around dma_ops, or even knowing about
> them.
May misunderstand, here the "dma_ops" is not the "dma_ops" of DMA API.
I mean the callbacks for xsk to do dma.
Maybe, I should rename it in the next version.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists