[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da22f057-806f-5ad8-f56c-7d3bf6a61746@mojatatu.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 13:35:04 -0300
From: Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net/sched: sch_htb: use extack on errors
messages
On 17/04/2023 12:52, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> [...]
>
> The rule of thumb I had was that if the message comes from "core" of
> a family then _MOD() is unnecessary. In this case HTB is a one-of-many
> implementations so _MOD() seems fine. Then again errors about parsing
> TCA_HTB_* attrs are unlikely to come from something else than HTB..
Agreed, will re-spin with this in mind.
Pedro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists