lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230417110413.01f20f1e@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:04:13 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "sd@...asysnail.net" <sd@...asysnail.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] macsec: Don't rely solely on the dst
 MAC address to identify destination MACsec device

On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 12:18:05 +0000 Emeel Hakim wrote:
>  struct macsec_rx_sc *rx_sc = NULL;
> 
> if (md_dst && md_dst->type == METADATA_MACSEC) 
>         rx_sc  = find_rx_sc(&macsec->secy, md_dst->u.macsec_info.sci);
> 
> what do you think?

Yes, definitely.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ