[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230417110413.01f20f1e@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:04:13 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Emeel Hakim <ehakim@...dia.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"sd@...asysnail.net" <sd@...asysnail.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] macsec: Don't rely solely on the dst
MAC address to identify destination MACsec device
On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 12:18:05 +0000 Emeel Hakim wrote:
> struct macsec_rx_sc *rx_sc = NULL;
>
> if (md_dst && md_dst->type == METADATA_MACSEC)
> rx_sc = find_rx_sc(&macsec->secy, md_dst->u.macsec_info.sci);
>
> what do you think?
Yes, definitely.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists