netdev - Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: reject small vring sizes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Apr 2023 07:03:52 +0000
From:   Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@...id-run.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: reject small vring sizes

> > > Actually, I think that all you need to do is disable NETIF_F_SG,
> > > and things will work, no?
> >
> > I think that this is not so simple, if I understand correctly, by disabling NETIF_F_SG we will never receive a chained skbs to transmit, but we still have more functionality to address, for example:
> > * The TX timeouts.
> 
> I don't get it. With a linear skb we can transmit it as long as there's
> space for 2 entries in the vq: header and data. What's the source of the
> timeouts?
> 

I'm not saying that this is not possible, I meant that we need more changes to virtio-net.
The source of the timeouts is from the current implementation of virtnet_poll_tx.

if (sq->vq->num_free >= 2 + MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
	netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);


> > * Guest GSO/big MTU (without VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF?), we can't chain page size buffers anymore.
> 
> I think we can.  mergeable_min_buf_len will just be large.
> 

I meant that we can't just by clearing NETIF_F_SG, we'll need to change virtio-net a little bit more, for example, the virtnet_set_big_packets function.