[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230417080749.39074-3-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:07:49 +0800
From: Feng zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
To: martin.lau@...ux.dev, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
mykolal@...com, shuah@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
yangzhenze@...edance.com, wangdongdong.6@...edance.com,
zhouchengming@...edance.com, zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test to access integer type of variable array
From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
Add prog test for accessing integer type of variable array in tracing
program.
Co-developed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 2 ++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c | 13 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
index fe847ebfb731..52785ba671e6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 {
long b;
};
+struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
+ int a;
+ int b[];
+};
+
__diag_push();
__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
"Global functions as their definitions will be in bpf_testmod.ko BTF");
@@ -63,6 +68,12 @@ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5(void) {
return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
}
+noinline int
+bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *a) {
+ bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result = a->b[0];
+ return bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_result;
+}
+
__bpf_kfunc void
bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i)
{
@@ -195,6 +206,7 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 struct_arg1 = {10};
struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 struct_arg2 = {2, 3};
+ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *struct_arg3;
int i = 1;
while (bpf_testmod_return_ptr(i))
@@ -206,6 +218,14 @@ bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_4(struct_arg1, 1, 2, 3, struct_arg2);
(void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5();
+ struct_arg3 = kmalloc((sizeof(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3) +
+ sizeof(int)), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (struct_arg3 != NULL) {
+ struct_arg3->b[0] = 1;
+ (void)bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6(struct_arg3);
+ kfree(struct_arg3);
+ }
+
/* This is always true. Use the check to make sure the compiler
* doesn't remove bpf_testmod_loop_test.
*/
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
index 48dc9472e160..1c75a32186d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ static void test_fentry(void)
ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t5_ret, 1, "t5 ret");
+ ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t6, 1, "t6 ret");
+
tracing_struct__detach(skel);
destroy_skel:
tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
index e718f0ebee7d..c435a3a8328a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
@@ -13,12 +13,18 @@ struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 {
long b;
};
+struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
+ int a;
+ int b[];
+};
+
long t1_a_a, t1_a_b, t1_b, t1_c, t1_ret, t1_nregs;
__u64 t1_reg0, t1_reg1, t1_reg2, t1_reg3;
long t2_a, t2_b_a, t2_b_b, t2_c, t2_ret;
long t3_a, t3_b, t3_c_a, t3_c_b, t3_ret;
long t4_a_a, t4_b, t4_c, t4_d, t4_e_a, t4_e_b, t4_ret;
long t5_ret;
+int t6;
SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1")
int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_1, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2, a, int, b, int, c)
@@ -117,4 +123,11 @@ int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_10, int, ret)
return 0;
}
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_6")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_11, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *, a)
+{
+ t6 = a->b[0];
+ return 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists