[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <024701d970db$17335890$459a09b0$@trustnetic.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 11:17:07 +0800
From: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
To: "'Wolfram Sang'" <wsa@...nel.org>,
"'Jarkko Nikula'" <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/6] net: txgbe: Implement I2C bus master driver
On Friday, April 14, 2023 7:05 PM, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> On Friday, April 14, 2023 12:29 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > > Implement I2C bus driver to send and receive I2C messages.
> > > > >
> > > > > This I2C license the IP of Synopsys Designware, but without interrupt
> > > > > support on the hardware design. It seems that polling mode needs to be
> > > > > added in Synopsys Designware I2C driver. But currently it can only be
> > > > > driven by this I2C bus master driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/wangxun/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > > .../net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_phy.c | 153
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > .../net/ethernet/wangxun/txgbe/txgbe_type.h | 23 +++
> > > > > 3 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > Looks like your use case has similarities with the commit 17631e8ca2d3
> > > ("i2c: designware: Add driver support for AMD NAVI GPU").
> >
> > Yes, can you please check if you can't use the current i2c designware
> > driver?
>
> Hi Jarkko & Wolfram,
>
> I read the i2c designware driver code, and found that 'dev->ss_hcnt' can
> only be obtained by i2c_dw_acpi_configure() or calculated by clock rate.
>
> I don't quite understand how to get the clock rate. I tried to add a software
> node of clock with property ("clock-frequency", 100000) and referenced by
> I2C node. But it didn't work.
>
> Can I deliver 'dev->ss_hcnt' via platform data? Or how should I fill in the
> software node?
>
The above question is in the case of platform driver.
Moreover, why 'dev->fs_hcnt' and 'dev->fs_lcont' must be set when I use the
standard mode? Should it be set only if I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_* ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists