netdev - Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/5] udp: Call inet6_destroy_sock() in setsockopt(IPV6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:21:21 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kuba@...nel.org, kuniyu@...zon.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/5] udp: Call inet6_destroy_sock() in
 setsockopt(IPV6_ADDRFORM).

On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 05:24:28PM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
> From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
> 
> commit 21985f43376cee092702d6cb963ff97a9d2ede68 upstream.

Why is this only relevant for 5.10.y?  What about 5.15.y?

For obvious reasons, we can not take patches only for older branches as
that would cause people to have regressions when moving to newer kernel
releases.  So can you please fix this up by sending a 5.15.y series, and
this 5.10.y series again, and we can queue them all up at the same time?

thanks,

greg k-h