netdev - Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/5] udp: Call inet6_destroy_sock() in setsockopt(IPV6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023041803-thing-phoney-39d0@gregkh>
Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:57:17 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Ziyang Xuan (William)" <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, kuba@...nel.org, kuniyu@...zon.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 1/5] udp: Call inet6_destroy_sock() in
 setsockopt(IPV6_ADDRFORM).

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 08:53:32PM +0800, Ziyang Xuan (William) wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:21:21PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 05:24:28PM +0800, Ziyang Xuan wrote:
> >>> From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
> >>>
> >>> commit 21985f43376cee092702d6cb963ff97a9d2ede68 upstream.
> >>
> >> Why is this only relevant for 5.10.y?  What about 5.15.y?
> >>
> >> For obvious reasons, we can not take patches only for older branches as
> >> that would cause people to have regressions when moving to newer kernel
> >> releases.  So can you please fix this up by sending a 5.15.y series, and
> >> this 5.10.y series again, and we can queue them all up at the same time?
> > 
> > Also a 6.1.y series to be complete.
> > 
> 4.14.y, 4.19.y, 5.4.y, 5.10.y, 5.15.y and 6.1.y are all involved.
> Can I send series for them all together?

Yes please, as 5 different patch series.

thanks,

greg k-h