netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/6] bpf: add bpf_link support for BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Apr 2023 21:48:48 +0200
From:   Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        dxu@...uu.xyz, qde@...cy.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/6] bpf: add bpf_link support for
 BPF_NETFILTER programs

Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> > +int bpf_nf_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > +{
> > +	struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> > +	struct bpf_link_primer link_primer;
> > +	struct bpf_nf_link *link;
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	if (attr->link_create.flags)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	if (attr->link_create.netfilter.reserved[0] | attr->link_create.netfilter.reserved[1])
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Why add 'reserved' name that we cannot change later?
> I think 'flags' is enough.

OK, I'll zap this.

> > +	link->hook_ops.pf = attr->link_create.netfilter.pf;
> > +	link->hook_ops.priority = attr->link_create.netfilter.prio;
> 
> let's use the same name in both cases ? Either prio or priority. Both sound fine.

OK, I'll go with "priority" then because thats what its named in
nf_hook_ops structure.