[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3fece61c-3cf3-8e0b-f7de-8e61d4ec9037@sangfor.com.cn>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 08:50:10 +0800
From: Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn>
To: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
keescook@...omium.org, grzegorzx.szczurek@...el.com,
mateusz.palczewski@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...gfor.com.cn>,
Huang Cun <huangcun@...gfor.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] iavf: Fix use-after-free in free_netdev
On 2023/4/19 0:02, Michal Kubiak wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 10:00:29PM +0800, Ding Hui wrote:
>> We do netif_napi_add() for all allocated q_vectors[], but potentially
>> do netif_napi_del() for part of them, then kfree q_vectors and lefted
>> invalid pointers at dev->napi_list.
>>
>> If num_active_queues is changed to less than allocated q_vectors[] by
>> by unexpected, when iavf_remove, we might see UAF in free_netdev like this:
>
> Nitpick: the word "by" is accidentally doubled.
>
Oops, I noticed too, and I'll update in v2.
> Also, I would recommend to add a description of reproduction steps (most
> preferably a script or a command sequence) which triggers such an error
> reported by KASAN.
>
Sure, I'll update in v2.
>>
>> [ 4093.900222] ==================================================================
>> [ 4093.900230] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in free_netdev+0x308/0x390
>> [ 4093.900232] Read of size 8 at addr ffff88b4dc145640 by task test-iavf-1.sh/6699
>> [ 4093.900233]
>> [ 4093.900236] CPU: 10 PID: 6699 Comm: test-iavf-1.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O --------- -t - 4.18.0 #1
>> [ 4093.900238] Hardware name: Powerleader PR2008AL/H12DSi-N6, BIOS 2.0 04/09/2021
>> [ 4093.900239] Call Trace:
>> [ 4093.900244] dump_stack+0x71/0xab
>> [ 4093.900249] print_address_description+0x6b/0x290
>> [ 4093.900251] ? free_netdev+0x308/0x390
>> [ 4093.900252] kasan_report+0x14a/0x2b0
>> [ 4093.900254] free_netdev+0x308/0x390
>> [ 4093.900261] iavf_remove+0x825/0xd20 [iavf]
>> [ 4093.900265] pci_device_remove+0xa8/0x1f0
>> [ 4093.900268] device_release_driver_internal+0x1c6/0x460
>> [ 4093.900271] pci_stop_bus_device+0x101/0x150
>> [ 4093.900273] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device+0xe/0x20
>> [ 4093.900275] pci_iov_remove_virtfn+0x187/0x420
>> [ 4093.900277] ? pci_iov_add_virtfn+0xe10/0xe10
>> [ 4093.900278] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
>> [ 4093.900280] sriov_disable+0xed/0x3e0
>> [ 4093.900282] ? bus_find_device+0x12d/0x1a0
>> [ 4093.900290] i40e_free_vfs+0x754/0x1210 [i40e]
>> [ 4093.900298] ? i40e_reset_all_vfs+0x880/0x880 [i40e]
>> [ 4093.900299] ? pci_get_device+0x7c/0x90
>> [ 4093.900300] ? pci_get_subsys+0x90/0x90
>> [ 4093.900306] ? pci_vfs_assigned.part.7+0x144/0x210
>> [ 4093.900309] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
>> [ 4093.900315] i40e_pci_sriov_configure+0x1fa/0x2e0 [i40e]
>> [ 4093.900318] sriov_numvfs_store+0x214/0x290
>> [ 4093.900320] ? sriov_totalvfs_show+0x30/0x30
>> [ 4093.900321] ? __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
>> [ 4093.900323] ? __check_object_size+0x15a/0x350
>> [ 4093.900326] kernfs_fop_write+0x280/0x3f0
>> [ 4093.900329] vfs_write+0x145/0x440
>> [ 4093.900330] ksys_write+0xab/0x160
>> [ 4093.900332] ? __ia32_sys_read+0xb0/0xb0
>> [ 4093.900334] ? fput_many+0x1a/0x120
>> [ 4093.900335] ? filp_close+0xf0/0x130
>> [ 4093.900338] do_syscall_64+0xa0/0x370
>> [ 4093.900339] ? page_fault+0x8/0x30
>> [ 4093.900341] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca
>> [ 4093.900357] RIP: 0033:0x7f16ad4d22c0
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 6 +-----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
>> index 095201e83c9d..a57e3425f960 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
>> @@ -1849,19 +1849,15 @@ static int iavf_alloc_q_vectors(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>> static void iavf_free_q_vectors(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
>> {
>> int q_idx, num_q_vectors;
>> - int napi_vectors;
>>
>> if (!adapter->q_vectors)
>> return;
>>
>> num_q_vectors = adapter->num_msix_vectors - NONQ_VECS;
>> - napi_vectors = adapter->num_active_queues;
>>
>> for (q_idx = 0; q_idx < num_q_vectors; q_idx++) {
>> struct iavf_q_vector *q_vector = &adapter->q_vectors[q_idx];
>> -
>> - if (q_idx < napi_vectors)
>> - netif_napi_del(&q_vector->napi);
>> + netif_napi_del(&q_vector->napi);
>> }
>> kfree(adapter->q_vectors);
>> adapter->q_vectors = NULL;
>
> The fix looks correct to me.
> We actually call "netif_napi_add()" for all allocated q_vectors unconditionally
> in "iavf_alloc_q_vectors()").
>
If you don't mind, I'll add Acked-by: tag in v2, thanks.
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
--
Thanks,
- Ding Hui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists