[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230419090314.GF44666@unreal>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:03:14 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@...ebox.fr>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
wangyang.guo@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dst: fix missing initialization of
rt_uncached
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:58:02AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 06:54:26PM +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote:
> > xfrm_alloc_dst() followed by xfrm4_dst_destroy(), without a
> > xfrm4_fill_dst() call in between, causes the following BUG:
> >
> > BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, fbxhostapd/732
> > lock: 0x890b7668, .magic: 890b7668, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
> > CPU: 0 PID: 732 Comm: fbxhostapd Not tainted 6.3.0-rc6-next-20230414-00613-ge8de66369925-dirty #9
> > Hardware name: Marvell Kirkwood (Flattened Device Tree)
> > unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14
> > show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x28/0x30
> > dump_stack_lvl from do_raw_spin_lock+0x20/0x80
> > do_raw_spin_lock from rt_del_uncached_list+0x30/0x64
> > rt_del_uncached_list from xfrm4_dst_destroy+0x3c/0xbc
> > xfrm4_dst_destroy from dst_destroy+0x5c/0xb0
> > dst_destroy from rcu_process_callbacks+0xc4/0xec
> > rcu_process_callbacks from __do_softirq+0xb4/0x22c
> > __do_softirq from call_with_stack+0x1c/0x24
> > call_with_stack from do_softirq+0x60/0x6c
> > do_softirq from __local_bh_enable_ip+0xa0/0xcc
> >
> > Patch "net: dst: Prevent false sharing vs. dst_entry:: __refcnt" moved
> > rt_uncached and rt_uncached_list fields from rtable struct to dst
> > struct, so they are more zeroed by memset_after(xdst, 0, u.dst) in
> > xfrm_alloc_dst().
> >
> > Note that rt_uncached (list_head) was never properly initialized at
> > alloc time, but xfrm[46]_dst_destroy() is written in such a way that
> > it was not an issue thanks to the memset:
> >
> > if (xdst->u.rt.dst.rt_uncached_list)
> > rt_del_uncached_list(&xdst->u.rt);
> >
> > The route code does it the other way around: rt_uncached_list is
> > assumed to be valid IIF rt_uncached list_head is not empty:
> >
> > void rt_del_uncached_list(struct rtable *rt)
> > {
> > if (!list_empty(&rt->dst.rt_uncached)) {
> > struct uncached_list *ul = rt->dst.rt_uncached_list;
> >
> > spin_lock_bh(&ul->lock);
> > list_del_init(&rt->dst.rt_uncached);
> > spin_unlock_bh(&ul->lock);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > This patch adds mandatory rt_uncached list_head initialization in
> > generic dst_init(), and adapt xfrm[46]_dst_destroy logic to match the
> > rest of the code.
> >
> > Fixes: d288a162dd1c ("net: dst: Prevent false sharing vs. dst_entry:: __refcnt")
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@...ebox.fr>
> > ---
> > net/core/dst.c | 1 +
> > net/ipv4/xfrm4_policy.c | 4 +---
> > net/ipv6/route.c | 1 -
> > net/ipv6/xfrm6_policy.c | 4 +---
> > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> It should go to net. Right now -rc7 is broken.
>
> Also the change is not complete, you need to delete INIT_LIST_HEAD(..rt_uncached)
> from rt_dst_alloc and rt_dst_clone too.
It will be nice to give a credit to kbuild.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202304162125.18b7bcdd-oliver.sang@intel.com
Thanks
>
> Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists