[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b3f92e7-e54c-bb7d-2d72-1a0875989d4a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 11:27:26 +0300
From: Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Pawel Chmielewski <pawel.chmielewski@...el.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] net: mlx5: switch comp_irqs_request() to using
for_each_numa_cpu
On 20/04/2023 8:19, Yury Norov wrote:
> for_each_numa_cpu() is a more straightforward alternative to
> for_each_numa_hop_mask() + for_each_cpu_andnot().
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c | 16 +++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> index 38b32e98f3bd..80368952e9b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eq.c
> @@ -817,12 +817,10 @@ static void comp_irqs_release(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> static int comp_irqs_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> {
> struct mlx5_eq_table *table = dev->priv.eq_table;
> - const struct cpumask *prev = cpu_none_mask;
> - const struct cpumask *mask;
> int ncomp_eqs = table->num_comp_eqs;
> u16 *cpus;
> int ret;
> - int cpu;
> + int cpu, hop;
> int i;
>
> ncomp_eqs = table->num_comp_eqs;
> @@ -844,15 +842,11 @@ static int comp_irqs_request(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>
> i = 0;
> rcu_read_lock();
> - for_each_numa_hop_mask(mask, dev->priv.numa_node) {
> - for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, mask, prev) {
> - cpus[i] = cpu;
> - if (++i == ncomp_eqs)
> - goto spread_done;
> - }
> - prev = mask;
> + for_each_numa_cpu(cpu, hop, dev->priv.numa_node, cpu_possible_mask) {
I like this clean API.
nit:
Previously cpu_online_mask was used here. Is this change intentional?
We can fix it in a followup patch if this is the only comment on the series.
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
> + cpus[i] = cpu;
> + if (++i == ncomp_eqs)
> + break;
> }
> -spread_done:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> ret = mlx5_irqs_request_vectors(dev, cpus, ncomp_eqs, table->comp_irqs);
> kfree(cpus);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists