netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net/sched: sch_htb: use extack on errors messages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230420071728.42258044@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Apr 2023 07:17:28 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        jiri@...nulli.us, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net/sched: sch_htb: use extack on
 errors messages

On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 23:14:54 -0300 Pedro Tammela wrote:
> > I missed the message changes on v1, but since the patches are already
> > Changes Requested in patchwork...
> > 
> > IDK what TC_HTB_LEAF_TO_INNER is exactly, neither do I understand
> > "Failed to offload leaf to inner". The first one should be "Failed to
> > alloc offload leaf queue" if anything.
> > 
> > Let's just stick to the existing messages?  
> 
> The existing messages omit that the offload operation failed, which I 
> think it would be important to say in these two cases.
> But taking a second look, the driver gets the extack so it should be up 
> to the driver to provide the appropriate context when the offload fails. 
> What do you think about demoting these messages to WEAK and change them 
> to something like:
> "Failed to offload %attribute"

Good idea!