[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEFOSGwKhIyzwWmB@corigine.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 16:38:00 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Danielle Ratson <danieller@...dia.com>,
Pranavi Somisetty <pranavi.somisetty@....com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>,
Ferenc Fejes <ferenc.fejes@...csson.com>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 4/9] net: enetc: include MAC Merge / FP
registers in register dump
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 02:14:54PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> These have been useful in debugging various problems related to frame
> preemption, so make them available through ethtool --register-dump for
> later too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> ---
> v1->v2: patch is new
>
> .../ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> index 838a92131963..e993ed04ab57 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ static const u32 enetc_port_regs[] = {
> ENETC_PM0_CMD_CFG, ENETC_PM0_MAXFRM, ENETC_PM0_IF_MODE
> };
>
> +static const u32 enetc_port_mm_regs[] = {
> + ENETC_MMCSR, ENETC_PFPMR, ENETC_PTCFPR(0), ENETC_PTCFPR(1),
> + ENETC_PTCFPR(2), ENETC_PTCFPR(3), ENETC_PTCFPR(4), ENETC_PTCFPR(5),
> + ENETC_PTCFPR(6), ENETC_PTCFPR(7),
> +};
> +
> static int enetc_get_reglen(struct net_device *ndev)
> {
> struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> @@ -45,6 +51,9 @@ static int enetc_get_reglen(struct net_device *ndev)
> if (hw->port)
> len += ARRAY_SIZE(enetc_port_regs);
>
> + if (hw->port && !!(priv->si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_QBU))
nit: I think you could make the condition.
if (hw->port && priv->si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_QBU)
which would be consistent with the condition in the next hunk.
> + len += ARRAY_SIZE(enetc_port_mm_regs);
> +
> len *= sizeof(u32) * 2; /* store 2 entries per reg: addr and value */
>
> return len;
> @@ -90,6 +99,14 @@ static void enetc_get_regs(struct net_device *ndev, struct ethtool_regs *regs,
> *buf++ = addr;
> *buf++ = enetc_rd(hw, addr);
> }
> +
> + if (priv->si->hw_features & ENETC_SI_F_QBU) {
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(enetc_port_mm_regs); i++) {
> + addr = ENETC_PORT_BASE + enetc_port_mm_regs[i];
> + *buf++ = addr;
> + *buf++ = enetc_rd(hw, addr);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> static const struct {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists