netdev - Re: Potential regression/bug in net/mlx5 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:46:25 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
        Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Shay Drory <shayd@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        selinux@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: Potential regression/bug in net/mlx5 driver

On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 17:43:11 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> So I checked with Arch and we agreed that the only devices that need to
> expose this management PF are Bluefield chips, which have dedicated device
> IDs, and newer than the affected FW, so we can fix this by making the check
> more strict by testing device IDs as well.
> 
> I will provide a patch by tomorrow, will let Paul test it first.

What's "by tomorrow"? Today COB or some time tomorrow? 
Paolo is sending the PR tomorrow, fix needs to be on the list *now*.