[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87edff5b-5d41-01ec-c629-b2634f894afc@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 19:01:18 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Gilad Sever <gilad9366@...il.com>
Cc: dsahern@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, song@...nel.org, yhs@...com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, mykolal@...com, shuah@...nel.org,
hawk@...nel.org, joe@...d.net.nz, eyal.birger@...il.com,
shmulik.ladkani@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf,v2 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tc_socket_lookup tests
On 4/20/23 6:44 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 04/20, Gilad Sever wrote:
>> Verify that socket lookup via TC with all BPF APIs is VRF aware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gilad Sever <gilad9366@...il.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Fix build by initializing vars with -1
Agree with Stan on all the refactoring changes and if we can simplify the
set without them. The other item on top of what has been commented is that
it would be great to also add test case for XDP as well to ensure that the
lookup behavior is consistent for both cases.
Thanks,
Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists