[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEOf7LXAkdLR0yFI@corigine.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 10:50:52 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@....net>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...e.dk>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@....qualcomm.com>,
"John W . Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gregg Wonderly <greggwonderly@...techllc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] wifi: ath9k: fix AR9003 mac hardware hang check
register offset calculation
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 10:43:16PM +0200, Peter Seiderer wrote:
> Fix ath9k_hw_verify_hang()/ar9003_hw_detect_mac_hang() register offset
> calculation (do not overflow the shift for the second register/queues
> above five, use the register layout described in the comments above
> ath9k_hw_verify_hang() instead).
>
> Fixes: 222e04830ff0 ("ath9k: Fix MAC HW hang check for AR9003")
>
> Reported-by: Gregg Wonderly <greggwonderly@...techllc.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/E3A9C354-0CB7-420C-ADEF-F0177FB722F4@seqtechllc.com/
> Signed-off-by: Peter Seiderer <ps.report@....net>
> ---
> Notes:
> - tested with MikroTik R11e-5HnD/Atheros AR9300 Rev:4 (lspci: 168c:0033
> Qualcomm Atheros AR958x 802.11abgn Wireless Network Adapter (rev 01))
> card
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_hw.c | 27 ++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_hw.c
> index 4f27a9fb1482..0ccf13a35fb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ar9003_hw.c
> @@ -1099,17 +1099,22 @@ static bool ath9k_hw_verify_hang(struct ath_hw *ah, unsigned int queue)
> {
> u32 dma_dbg_chain, dma_dbg_complete;
> u8 dcu_chain_state, dcu_complete_state;
> + unsigned int dbg_reg, reg_offset;
> int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < NUM_STATUS_READS; i++) {
> - if (queue < 6)
> - dma_dbg_chain = REG_READ(ah, AR_DMADBG_4);
> - else
> - dma_dbg_chain = REG_READ(ah, AR_DMADBG_5);
> + if (queue < 6) {
> + dbg_reg = AR_DMADBG_4;
> + reg_offset = i * 5;
Hi Peter,
unless my eyes are deceiving me, i is not initialised here.
> + } else {
> + dbg_reg = AR_DMADBG_5;
> + reg_offset = (i - 6) * 5;
Or here.
> + }
>
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_STATUS_READS; i++) {
> + dma_dbg_chain = REG_READ(ah, dbg_reg);
> dma_dbg_complete = REG_READ(ah, AR_DMADBG_6);
>
> - dcu_chain_state = (dma_dbg_chain >> (5 * queue)) & 0x1f;
> + dcu_chain_state = (dma_dbg_chain >> reg_offset) & 0x1f;
> dcu_complete_state = dma_dbg_complete & 0x3;
>
> if ((dcu_chain_state != 0x6) || (dcu_complete_state != 0x1))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists