[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1957131.PYKUYFuaPT@suse>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:19:04 +0200
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 41/55] iscsi: Assume "sendpage" is okay in
iscsi_tcp_segment_map()
On venerdì 31 marzo 2023 18:09:00 CEST David Howells wrote:
> As iscsi is now using sendmsg() with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES rather than sendpage,
> assume that sendpage_ok() will return true in iscsi_tcp_segment_map() and
> leave it to TCP to copy the data if not.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
> cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
> cc: target-devel@...r.kernel.org
> cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c | 13 +++----------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c
> index c182aa83f2c9..07ba0d864820 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c
> @@ -128,18 +128,11 @@ static void iscsi_tcp_segment_map(struct iscsi_segment
> *segment, int recv) * coalescing neighboring slab objects into a single frag
> which
> * triggers one of hardened usercopy checks.
> */
> - if (!recv && sendpage_ok(sg_page(sg)))
> + if (!recv)
> return;
>
> - if (recv) {
> - segment->atomic_mapped = true;
> - segment->sg_mapped = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg));
> - } else {
> - segment->atomic_mapped = false;
> - /* the xmit path can sleep with the page mapped so use
kmap */
> - segment->sg_mapped = kmap(sg_page(sg));
> - }
> -
> + segment->atomic_mapped = true;
> + segment->sg_mapped = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg));
As you probably know, kmap_atomic() is deprecated.
I must admit that I'm not an expert of this code, however, it looks like the
mapping has no need to rely on the side effects of kmap_atomic() (i.e.,
pagefault_disable() and preempt_disable() - but I'm not entirely sure about
the possibility that preemption should be explicitly disabled along with the
replacement with kmap_local_page()).
Last year I've been working on several conversions from kmap{,_atomic}() to
kmap_local_page(), however I'm still not sure to understand what's happening
here...
Am I missing any important details? Can you please explain why we still need
that kmap_atomic() instead of kmap_local_page()?
Thanks in advance,
Fabio
> segment->data = segment->sg_mapped + sg->offset + segment-
>sg_offset;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists