lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1957131.PYKUYFuaPT@suse> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:19:04 +0200 From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 41/55] iscsi: Assume "sendpage" is okay in iscsi_tcp_segment_map() On venerdì 31 marzo 2023 18:09:00 CEST David Howells wrote: > As iscsi is now using sendmsg() with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES rather than sendpage, > assume that sendpage_ok() will return true in iscsi_tcp_segment_map() and > leave it to TCP to copy the data if not. > > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> > cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com> > cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> > cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> > cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> > cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> > cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> > cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> > cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org > cc: target-devel@...r.kernel.org > cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org > --- > drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c | 13 +++---------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c > index c182aa83f2c9..07ba0d864820 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c > @@ -128,18 +128,11 @@ static void iscsi_tcp_segment_map(struct iscsi_segment > *segment, int recv) * coalescing neighboring slab objects into a single frag > which > * triggers one of hardened usercopy checks. > */ > - if (!recv && sendpage_ok(sg_page(sg))) > + if (!recv) > return; > > - if (recv) { > - segment->atomic_mapped = true; > - segment->sg_mapped = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)); > - } else { > - segment->atomic_mapped = false; > - /* the xmit path can sleep with the page mapped so use kmap */ > - segment->sg_mapped = kmap(sg_page(sg)); > - } > - > + segment->atomic_mapped = true; > + segment->sg_mapped = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg)); As you probably know, kmap_atomic() is deprecated. I must admit that I'm not an expert of this code, however, it looks like the mapping has no need to rely on the side effects of kmap_atomic() (i.e., pagefault_disable() and preempt_disable() - but I'm not entirely sure about the possibility that preemption should be explicitly disabled along with the replacement with kmap_local_page()). Last year I've been working on several conversions from kmap{,_atomic}() to kmap_local_page(), however I'm still not sure to understand what's happening here... Am I missing any important details? Can you please explain why we still need that kmap_atomic() instead of kmap_local_page()? Thanks in advance, Fabio > segment->data = segment->sg_mapped + sg->offset + segment- >sg_offset; > }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists