netdev - Re: [PATCH ethtool] netlink: settings: fix netlink support when PLCA is not present

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:40:57 +0200
From:   Piergiorgio Beruto <piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     mkubecek@...e.cz, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool] netlink: settings: fix netlink support when PLCA
 is not present

On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 05:07:42PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> PLCA support threw the PLCA commands as required into the initial
> support check at the start of nl_gset(). That's not correct.
> The initial check (AFAIU) queries for the base support in the kernel
> i.e. support for the commands which correspond to ioctls.
> If those are not available (presumably very old kernel or kernel
> without ethtool-netlink) we're better off using the ioctl.
> 
> For new functionality, however, falling back to ioctl
> is counterproductive. New functionality (like PLCA) isn't
> supported via the ioctl, anyway, and we're losing all the other
> netlink-only functionality (I noticed that the link down statistics
> are gone).
> 
> After much deliberation I decided to add a second check for
> command support in gset_request(). Seems cleanest and if any
> of the non-required commands narrows the capabilities (e.g.
> does not support dump) we should just skip it too. Falling
> back to ioctl would again be a regression.
Hi Jackub,
please ignore my previous reply, the segmentation fault I saw was
actually triggered by a different problem I had on my reference
platform.

I've successfully tested this patch with and without netlink.
Please, add me as reviewer and tester.

Kind Regards,
Piergiorgio