[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230425085140.000bbcc1@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 08:51:40 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [net PATCH 5/9] octeontx2-pf: mcs: Fix NULL pointer
dereferences
On Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:29:02 +0000 Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta wrote:
> >How did you get call to .mdo_del_secy if you didn't add any secy?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> It is because of the order of teardown in otx2_remove:
> cn10k_mcs_free(pf);
> unregister_netdev(netdev);
>
> cn10k_mcs_free free the resources and makes cfg as NULL.
> Later unregister_netdev calls mdo_del_secy and finds cfg as NULL.
> Thanks for the review I will change the order and submit next version.
Leon, ack? Looks like the patches got "changes requested" but I see
no other complaint.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists